Corporate Social Responsibility Essay

Competition is becoming much than and more fierce while the market is becoming globalization. With higher consumer s overeignty, customers argon no coarseer convenient with qualify ingatherings and good services. The society concerned more about the concern ethic and environsal issues. Companies argon expected to wreak virtuously directly. The conceits of Corporate affable Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship ar spread wit faster than ever before and become one of the hot dirty dogvass business models in the recent decades. Corporate cordial Responsibility (CSR) is defined as the payload of business to contribute to sustainable economic development, workings with employees, their families, the topical anaesthetic fraternity and society at large to make founder their quality of life at the piece Business Council for Sustainable Development in 2000. The main idea of CSR is that corporations should be responsible for(p) to the stakeholders which include the customers, sh atomic number 18holders, suppliers, employees or any separate society that may be influenced by the corporeal actions. variant organizations may save formed different mixer responsible platforms which sack be reason in four major components the environment, the society, the work habitation and the market place. Different companies will emphasize on different aspects to create the neighborly responsible programs. Particular CSR initiatives may do good, or harm, or make no difference one bureau or the other, but it is important to dissent the success of the CSR idea. (Briggs & Verma, 2006) Mounting evidences show the benefits brought by the CSR Programs. For example, corporations made huge boon to disasters nationwide and to the bottom billions.However, not every CSR Program crumb be built up successfully. Nestl had suffered from a boycott last over 30 years which is the result from its failed CSR Program. Kn take in as the baby depleteer, Nestl is bl amed to kill thousands of Babies in the less developed region. They promoted and distributed free instant formula take out powder to replace breastfeeding and led to severe health problems or level off death to the babies (Sethi, 1979). The two opposite results of CSR programs bring up queries for CSR programs. Is there a business shimmy for CSR? How can corporations be benefitted from CSR? Theses questions will be discussed in this essay and so as the answers.B. Is there a business case for CSR?Corporations are expected to be good citizens asserted by Briggs and Verma (2006). Customers are demanding more from the corporations. Responsible incorporates are required to meet the Triple git Lines which are the economic sustainability, environmental sustainability and social sustainability. Join Elington illustrate the interrelationship of the triple bottom confines in 1997, Society depends on the economy and the economy depends on the global ecosystem, whose health represents the ultimate bottom line (Elkington, 1997). CSR programs can as well help the company to succeed sustainable maturation which is the ultimate goal for every CSR program. Sustainable development is development to indulge the motives of present generation without sacrificing the ability of future generations to development (WCED, 1987). theater of operations indicates that sustainable growth and business success cannot be achieved solely by maximising short-term arrive ats, but instead through market-oriented and social responsible programs (Neal, 2006). The CSR programs may engage with the following four aspects the environment, the community, the workplace and the market place (World Business Council, 2000).As the foundation of every human organism in the earth, responsible to environment is an essential part of CSR programs. Learnt from the Industrial Revolution when mass sacrifice environment for business growth, private organizations today have worked to improve the envir onment. For example, Toyota has developed the hybrid card models which can use both enkindle and electricity as power source. It can help to reduce the pass around pollution and reduce the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. This innovation is also being considered as long-term oriented and sustainable for future development so both the customers and investors are satisfied with it. The second aspect of corporate social province is the community. Corporations have to be obligation to the local community as they are the essential for the business success. Social responsible firms should hire local labour force in the work place. Corporations often make share after huge disasters such as earthquake or hurricane.For example, companies had donated over US$547 millions after the catastrophe of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 (Briggs & Verma, 2006). Although some criticize that the corporations are making disasters into opportunities for open relationship, the donation can certainly help t he community to rebuilt their home afterward, The third aspect of corporate social state is the workplace. Companies are responsible to ensure the safety and ethnic in the workplace. The employees are generating the profit so the companies should be responsible to them by creating harmless and harmony working environment. For example, Nike, and other American and European sports wear production companies, promise to monitor the working conditions in its supplier factories in less developed countries (Vogel, 2005, 1).Corporations should also be responsible to the market place. Not just manufacturing quality product but also meeting the needs of various customers. For example, although smart telephone sets are becoming popular in recent years, some people with opthalmic disability may not able to use those products without assistant from other people. By introducing the Voiceover application, customers with visual disability can use the smart phone or other devices created by Appl e easily. Besides the positive maneuver of view, there have always been criticisms of CSR ever since it was invented. In 1970, the Nobel Price winner, Friedman wrote The Social Responsibility of Business is to make up its Profits and the three main aims he stated in his article have become the foundation for the criticisms against CSR. In his first argument, Friedman claimed that only human beings have a moral responsibility for their actions (Friedman, 1970).As a collected entity, companies do not have the responsibility of the decision made by the way. However, corporations act like human in some(prenominal) ways. For examples, in legal terms, corporations are consisted as an artificial someone whose behavior is decided by the corporate internal decision var.ing and the organizational culture. Many corporations are acting progressively to create a public perception of good citizenship to gain positive image and emulous advantages from the society (Brigs and Verma, 2006). In the following article, Friedman pointed out that the organization, instead of the private business section, should be responsible to solve the social issues and problems (Friedman, 1970). Later scholars support his argument that with huge amount of tax collected by the government, the responsibility of social support should be transferred to the government and the public sectors.However, in some cases, government may not be able to take the responsibility delinquent to insufficient funds or malfunction of government agent. Geoge Kell, executive head of the United Nationss Global Compact Office, indicated that So long as government fail to do their part and so long as business goes global, CSR helps fill an important void (Brigs and Verma, 2006). The last argument of Friedman is that the managers should be responsible for the interest of shareholders (Friedman, 1970). Charring out CSR programs may increase the cost and break dance the companys performance. In which way, the int erests of the shareholders are harmed (Henderson, 2001). This argument is proven amiss(p) by the countless successful business cases of CSR programs.C. How can corporations be benefited from the CSR programs?1. CSR can help the corporates to increase the profits. Corporations can be benefited from the CSR programs in many aspects. Since the or so important goal for the company is maximise its profit, scholars and managers are working to haoma out how CSR programs will influence the companys profitability. Companies gener entirelyy increase their profitability by two means Cut cost and distinction (Porter, 1985). An effective CSR Programs can help the corporations to achieve both points. Cost simplification can be achieved by CSR Programs directly or indirectly. The direct way is to reduce the cost by using the raw material or energy in a more efficient way. For example, by bring down the packaging, companies can cut the unit cost of product and protect the environment by produ cing less waste at the same time (Welford, 2000).The other way is to decrease the indirect cost such as the employee discipline cost, the management cost. For example, the employee caring programs can lower the employee turnover rate and reducing the hiring and training cost for new employees. By this mean, the employees are more satisfied to the companies and will be less likely to resign and have better performance in the workplace. Google has been paid attention to this issue. The company created the best working environment in the world and create the most satisfied. The CSR program successes in increasing ability to attract and retain employees and reducing operating cost. other way to increase profitability is differentiation.By using differentiation strategy, the products can be outstanding among the competitors (Welford, 2000). Corporates have been using CSR programs as differentiation points long ago and achieve positive result. Take the Body Shop as an example. They dif ferentiate their products from the other skin care products by using all natural ingredients and making statements such as no animal test and support community fair trade. By building such social and environmental responsibility image, the Body Shop successfully build up its defect image and reputation and create the customer loyalty. 2. CSR can enhance defacement competitiveness.Todays companies can no all-night afford to ignore CSR. More and more corporates build up their own CSR programs to enhance their brand competitiveness by enhancing the image and reputation of the corporates. Firstly, customers nowadays focus more on the image and reputation of the brands. They demand more than quality product and nice services. According to the research conducted by the PR firm Hill & Knowlton, 79% of Americans take corporate citizenship into account when makings obtain decision (Briggs and Verma, 2006). Corporate Social Responsibility Programs can help the corporate to gain the public trust and support which will enhance the brand competitiveness.Customer sovereignty has further supported the ideas that with high degree of freedom and information, customers can make their choices among different brands. The brand with better image or reputation will be more likely to win in the industry. Secondly, Corporate Citizenship is demanded by the government. Especially for some sensitive business that companies need to maintain nice relationship with the government. For example, Casino Industry in Las Vegas and Macao are expected to make large donation to the responsible gambling program or the charity funds.By making public donation, the firms may be able to build up better image to reduce the scorn in the society and the government. Managers continually encounter demands from multiple stakeholder groups to devote resources to corporate social responsibility (McWilliams & Siegel, 2001). Investors consider more about the social responsibility of the invested firms nowa days. Companies cannot managing their impact on society and the environment if engaging in CSR (Brigs & Verma, 2006)D. endpointCorporate Social Responsibility is becoming the trend of social public relationship strategies in the recent decades. In this essay, questions of CSR programs have been discussed in many aspects. With thousands of successful cases of corporate citizenship, companies all working hard to catch up with the trend and develop their own CSR programs. Although there are criticisms about the end and the necessity of corporate social responsibility programs, the effective of CSR programs is ascertained. Later ruminate shows that successful CSR program can benefit the society and the company at the same time. The corporations can enjoy higher profits and better brand competitiveness by setting up CSR programs. Therefore, companies should work with the community to achieve the win-win situation.BibliographyBriggs, W. & Verma, A. 2006. Sharing the wealth. Communicati on world. January February 2006. pp. 25-28 Freeman, R.E. 1984 Strategic Management A Stakeholder approach path. Marshfield, MA Pitman Publishing Inc. Friedman, M. 1970 The Social Responsibility of Business is to addition its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970 Henderson, D. 2001. The Case Against Corporate Social Responsibility. Policy Vol.17 no.2. pp. 28-32. Winter 2001 Neal, A. C. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility cheek Gain or Laissez-Faire Figleaf?. HeinOnline. 2007-2008. pp. 460-474 Robison, M. 2002. RSA Wold Leaders Lecture Beyond full Intentions Corporate Citizenship for a New Century. United Nations High Commissioner for merciful Rights. London, 7 May 2002. Sethi, S. P. 1979. A Conceptual Framework for Environmental depth psychology of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns. The Acdemy of Management Review, Vol.4, No. 1, pp. 63-74 Vogle, D. The commercialise for Virtue the Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsib ility. 2005. Harrisonburg, Virginia WCED. 1987. Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford Oxford University Press. Welford, R. 2000 Corporate environmental management 3 Towards sustainable development, London Earthscan.