How Will Singapore Effect Globalization Of National Identity Cultural Studies Essay

How Will capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of Singapore Effect Globalization Of guinea pig Identity heathen Stu survives EssaySingapore, one of the most inter topicized res publicas in the gentleman today, had under(a)gone a serial of political and sparing crises in the past forcing its leaders to take on a proactive stance to the conformatio people of matter individualism element . oneness stance the government took was forging a depicted object romance of go up that depicted Singapores transformation from a third world fishing hamlet to a first world republic. The catalyze of this metamorphosis was world-wideisation, finished orbiculateizing strategies such(prenominal) as establishing English as the countrys first language building Singapores thriftiness through partnerships with multi field corporations importing public culture from over the world advocating and sending Singaporeans to study abroad encouragi ng the immigration of foreign gift and stressing a global orientation rather than a local individuation operator element. The embracement of globalisation through these strategies has led Singapore to acquire political stability and frugal growth. However, they lease weakened the countrys favorable bonds with ar critical for pursuing the necessitate for depicted object identity in Singapore.Although there ar other aspects of Singapores national identity, this discussion allow for focus on the national identity of frugal leave be curtilage it has a direct correlation with the Republics embrace of globalisation.This paper will firstly study the terms globalisation and national identity in the context of Singapore. After which, address five exposes derived from Singapores embracement of globalization that has an ill nucleus on the republics national identity quest.Firstly, the way in which Singapore practices discriminating globalization that has led to an antagonis tic relationship between local identities and global identities of the lot. Secondly, the recognition of Singapore as a global nation estate and how that loses national identity for incoming generations. Thirdly, how the influences of popular culture affects Singapores national identity adversely. Fourthly, how do its of emigration and immigration pass undermined national identity. Fifthly, how Singapores declaration as a global city has led to the debilitation of Singapores national identity from which the problem of commitment arose. And sixthly, how Singapores advantage story, as a result of globalization, thwarts efforts of cementing the Republics national identity.Singapores National IdentityBefore we discuss Singapores national identity, this paper defines the concept of a nation, in relation to Singapore, as imagined and as a purposeful defecate . This is because Singapore does not surrender a long history. Further more(prenominal), it is populated by a myriad of dif ferent ethnicities.Since independence, the Singaporean government has tried to encourage a national identity in Singapore. The aim of this was to unite the tangled immigrant population under the nation-state in the hope that a uniquely Singaporean identity, which the people could identify with, would emerge.The Singapore government has placed strong tenseness on creating a material-based national identity through the presence and availability of frugal development, home-ownership, asset-enhancement, a high standard of living and modern facilities. This has created a genial modernity that evokes a smell of Singapores national identity in practical and material terms . Hence, the cleanliness of the environment and the efficiency in the dry land of everyday Singaporean living atomic number 18 qualities the government promotes as Singapores national identity and national symbols. Singaporeans high quality of life as a resultant of globalization and commercial development reemph asizes the national identity of economic progress.Globalization in the context of SingaporeMany scholars view globalization as a force, which would bring about the decline , erosion or the end of the nation-state. True to this definition, Singapores embrace for globalization has created problems by modify steamy ties and the national identity of the nation. This is demonstrated by a crippling of social cohesion deep down the community a pragmatic locating of Singaporeans and an extend number of gifted Singaporeans choosing to emigrate.Although the Singapore government attempts to connect the people under the notion of a national identity that is based on the myth of overcoming adversity, this paper posits that the process of globalization undermines Singapores territorial boundaries, the nations sovereignty, and its traditional roles, thus undermining the Republics national identity quest.Singapores practice of selective globalizationGlobalization exposes nation-states to both opportunities and challenges. Singapore has moved from the process of building a nation-state to becoming a global city. The government practices selective globalization where certain forms are encouraged and others are discouraged . While, they champion for the synchronization of regulations and policies with worldwide standards, they protect their society from nauseous global commodities such as pornographic magazines. On one hand, Singapore enjoys its status as one of the most globalized countries in the world in terms of finance and telecommunications. On the other hand, Singapore regularly gets criticized from international adult male rights institutions for insisting to practice its own label of politics . The issue of Singapore practicing selective globalization portrays the need to remain globally committed for the sole purpose of survival, while the retention of certain traditional ideals expresses the fatality to protect specific interest.Long suggests, that the act o f cultures globalizing and de-globalizing within localities at the equivalent time is synchronized through local practices and ideals generated symbols transmitted through the media, whether global or local, are at the forefront of forming a contemporary culture .This would mean that globalization weakens the building blocks of national identity because of the reinforcement of social relations through messages, images and symbols that would connect individuals to what Anderson referred to as imagined communities . To explain further, these imagined communities are created through the process of media-related visual cues. An influx of these cues from globalization and localization causes Singapores national identity to be continually contested and negotiated.Singapore as a globalizing nation stateMinister Mentor Lee Kwan Yew once said if more Singaporeans worked abroad and their children forgot their rootsThey dissolve and disappear and there is no Singapore They buy the farm citiz ens of the world. What does that mean? Lost .As Singapores leaders continue to drive Singapore to become a globalized entity, global influences, such as international tuition and marriage to foreigners, result in the diminishing of Singapores nation identity. The main issue here is the loss of Singapores future generations of globalized young citizens who were never assailable to the awe of regional hostility or global alienation . Ironically, these generations of Singaporeans have been exposed to the very setting created by the government Singapores global environment that have in turn caused them to diminish their sense of national identity.The influence of popular culture on youths in SingaporeThe lack of national identity of Singapores most globalized segment of the population, the socially and politically apathetic younger generation, is a pivotal political issue in Singapore.Singapore leaders have tried to combat the social and political consequence of embracing globaliza tion by recounting Singapores touchy past to the future generations as an attend to to Singapores shortfall . However, the attraction of globalization presents itself as a strong intimidation to the Republics vision for its citizens.This deterrence can be explained by Bergers proposition of an emerging global culture distinguished by individuation . The embracement of globalization and its pic to the people has happen upond Individuation, which in Singapores context suggests the ability of citizens to form a stronger sense of self or individuality over the nations collectiveness hence a weakening of national identity.To add on to the peoples sense of individuation, constrains in freedom of check of the government have led to demonstration of social trends such as the appropriation of immigration and emigration, as well as a global apathy towards national issues. The latter is best expressed as an attitude of indifference toward defending the nation, as well as, an attitude o f dispassion towards Singapores national identity.Globalization issues of emigration and immigration in SingaporeTo nurture their unless resource, people, Singapore sends its people abroad for higher education and training, and to hone their human resources, Singapore induces foreign talent to immigrate to Singapore. Even though these strategies have been successful, in championing objectives of increasing Singapores human talent pool, they weaken the national identity of the nation.Most Singaporeans sent overseas find more opportunities abroad and do not return. By the same token, new immigrants have a great attachment to their home countries and would leave Singapore eventually. It is clear that although globalization helps Singapore thrive successfully, it undermines a deep attachment to the nation, hence undermining national identity.Furthermore, talented Singaporeans also feel that they will have more professional opportunities if they leftover Singapore to become a foreign talent. In responds to this, the leaders of Singapore specifyd that they are aware of the double-edge sword of globalization, and included that emigration of talented Singaporeans would cause the core of the nation to unravel .It is important to note that the matters raised above, within the quitter- extender debate, do not entirely point to issues pertaining to loyalty. Rather it points to issues that have emerged from the memorial tablet of a national identity in conjunction with the Republics efforts to embrace globalization Meritocracy.Meritocracy, Singapores national value, has aptly associated talent to success and reward. It was strategically propagated to put Singapore on the global economy map . Today, this very ideal that helped achieve Singapores global status also diminishes the Republics national identity by ingraining an opportunistic mindset into the people, hence indirectly telling Singapores talent to go where opportunities exist.Commitment issues in Singapore a s a result of globalizationAnother repercussion to Singapores embracement of globalization has been a sabotaging of commitment to Singapores well being, where the future generations are unwilling to sacrifice for the nation.One letter in the headland Times forum page read, What do we have in Singapore that are worth dying for? This paper suggests that Singapore only actually offers economic gain. Unfortunately, that could be attained elsewhere, hence there is nothing that compels Singaporeans to stay here, let alone die for their country . Although Singapores myth of economic progress is seen by the nation as a firm foundation of its national identity, it is being undermined because of globalization.In relation to the point above, Anderson puts, the imaginings of a nation are limited to the extent of elastic boundaries . Economic progress is not something sole(a) to Singapore and therefore its usage as a national identity by the state is undermined. Through globalization, people identity themselves with an international community, and hence marginalize Singapores national identity of economic progress.Studies have shown that while Singaporeans indicate that they experience a national identity through materiality and achievements of the nation, this form of identity does not conjure up a feeling of allegiance. incomplete does it evoke a passion that people may fight and die for, nor does it arouse a sense of differentiation between other cultures.Singapores success story as a national identityVery besides to the point above, Singapores success story of economic progress, which led the Republic to achieving a worldwide identity, could diminish Singapores national identity. In what this paper views as the Singapore paradox, the goals of the state, which is to sustain the nation, could be threatened by the successful integration of its people into a de-nationalizing globalized identity. This is because globalization propagates factors like transnational migra tion that undermines the national identity of the Singapore. endThis discussion of globalizations effects on Singapores national identity raises several conclusions that are relevant not only to Singaporeans but to other nations undergoing processes of globalization.Singapores government has embraced globalization as a vital means of not only economic growth but also the Republics survival. This paper has portrayed how the embracement of globalization exerts push on Singapores difficulty to construct an effective connection between the nation and its citizens through a quest for national identity. The very tactics of globalization that have led to the rise of Singapores economy have compromised the nations shared identity and opportunities and as a result of the rise of Singapores affluence through globalization, it is difficult to minimize the negative factors of globalization and maximize the positive factors of localization in establishing a national identity.